My biggest frustration with this entire election season and politics in general is how much
voting is based on opinion instead of facts. We should all agree
that the media is biased, so the tendency is to pick and choose media
outlets that share our bias instead of researching the facts for
ourselves to verify that it is true. I try to practice the
5-step validation process I shared in a blog post previously to che
ck
what I post here to ensure that it is valid, but it takes time, so I
still have plenty of information to verify and fact check before sharing
more here.
When the FBI releases their report of findings from the Clinton email and Clinton Foundation investigations, we will have confirmed information (much of which is already available and verified through WikiLeaks's released emails) which NONE OF US (not even Clinton's most
vehement opponents) wants to be true. These facts will matter far
more than the candidates' personalities or character and possibly more than their party platform goals. The truth in these cases has the potential to negatively impact every
single American regardless of race, gender, sexual preference, religion,
or political affiliation. Even though what is on the line crosses all
party lines, how we vote in the POTUS race should directly impact the long
term outcome.
I would like to hint at those findings by parsing through today's headlines to find a few key facts. (Note: Facts, not opinions, are what truly matter, so verify everything) The FBI claims they are
99% confident that their findings
will result in an indictment of Hillary (and likely Huma, Weiner, Podesta, Lynch, Mills, and
others). Emails released by WikiLeaks reveal coordinated
collusion between the DOJ and the White House to ensure that Hillary was not indicted even though
Comey listed a large number of felonies committed through her careless handling of sensitive email on national television, and it's all summarized in FBI reports found
here. So assuming this collusion
continues, we can expect repeated interference from Lynch to thwart justice on the reopened email investigation and the Clinton Foundation investigation as well.
Clinton supporters prefer to
ignore WikiLeaks despite the growing evidence (Colin Powell,
Donna Brazile, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz) that validates the authenticity and
accuracy of these leaked emails. They also insist the FBI investigation
into the Clinton Foundation, which has been going on for a year now, is a
political stunt to impact the elections. They insist the CF does a lot
of good work and that all the accusations are both false and politically
motivated.
So how do we know who is telling the truth? Can we
trust the FBI reports and verified WikiLeaks over defensive comments by the candidates
and pundits who have so much at stake? Common sense would say "of course not". Another way to make an objective
assessment is to follow the money.
Clinton Foundation financials are
available at online. These
financials only list the money that goes directly to the Foundation.
The $68 million or more of personal contributions channeled to Bill and Hillary privately through the shakedown scandal uncovered by
WikiLeaks
and reported by the
NY Times, MSBNC and others are NOT included in these
financials. This is strictly Foundation money. In 2013, the most
recent financials I found, the CF spent 57% of the revenue the took
in. Of the Foundation's total
expenditures, they only gave away 10% via grants (6% in the US and
4% overseas). We will not discuss how the money they actually gave away
was used (though there is mounting testimony indicating that it went
to support friends or donors with associated business interests instead
of actually helping people in need). Let's only consider the facts from the financial statements which I have summarized in the image below.
Compare the
Clinton Foundation financials to
the
Trump Foundation financials to get an idea of what we should expect
to see from a non-profit charitable foundation used to consolidate and
channel contributions to worthy causes.
So who gives money to
a charitable organization with operating costs so high that only 10% of their
expenses (or 6% of their revenues) actually go toward charitable grants? The list of CF donors are provided on the
CF website and on the
financial statement to some extent. Some (or many) of these donors have
personal, business, political, or radical Islamic interests that a
Secretary of State or POTUS could assist through the use of federal
resources and high level government influence. If the money goes
directly to the Clintons and bypasses the CF to the tune of the $68M
reported, imagine how much of America these donors could buy?
Uranium deals for Russia? Executive pardons? Prison closures? Open
borders? Weapons for ISIS?
Refusal to send help despite repeated calls for help and insistence from the Pentagon to cover up the arms transfer? that was ready and available despite Immigration papers for known terrorists? A
nuclear deal with Iran? Positions of power within the US government?
Removal from the terrorist watch list?
Access to critical persons of interest? Fetal body parts from Planned
Parenthood? Human trafficking assistance? Classified information?
(Side Note: The FBI confirmed
that
five different foreign intelligent agencies accessed Clinton's emails, some rated at the
highest possible security classification, which gives them enough
information to do irreparable harm.)
19 Do
not pervert justice or show partiality. Do not accept a bribe, for a
bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the innocent. 20 Follow justice and justice alone, so that you may live and possess the land the Lord your God is giving you. (Deuteronomy 16: 19-21)
Please also
consider that when a government entity contributes funds to any organization, whether schools, healthcare, banks, car manufacturers, etc., then the
government takes ownership interest in it. Common Core forced federal
control over our schools. Obamacare puts our healthcare in the
government's hands. Similarly, when foreign countries invest in America
by donating to the CF or by paying the the Clinton couple directly, they take ownership of America. That includes our people, our resources, and our security. Ownership of America by other nations equates to control by other nations.
Foreign money and political corruption for personal profit directly contributed to the fall of Rome, by the way.
While the FBI is expected to present scathing and undeniable evidence of numerous, far reaching, and excessive white-collar crimes through the Clinton Foundation, we cannot expect the selling off of America for the personal profit by the Clintons or any other
Washington elite to stop or be punished as long as the DOJ continues in collusion with the Clintons, bypassing our nation's laws to forbid indictment. The only ways we can help stop this corruption that I can see (please enlighten me
of others as I am no expert)
so that justice can be meted and so that America can be reclaimed for
everyone (consider again how CF corruption hurts all Americans, without
respect to political party) are as follows:
- Vote against
Hillary. Yes that means a vote for Trump, no matter how one may despise
his character or the allegations against him, which thankfully, are
mostly either unproven or have been retracted (except for the lewd
comments he admitted and apologized for) so that Trump can replace Lynch
who has consistently demonstrated intent to block prosecution. Would the quote, "Desperate times call for desperate measures apply here?"
- Support the ACLJ and any other legal firms with the expertise and respect for law and justice to
successfully prosecute the DOJ and all guilty parties in court. We
must consider, however, that any case that makes it to the Supreme Court could
still be thrown out if the new POTUS elects a pro-corruption,
Pro-Clinton justice. See previous bullet point.
- Pray for God's truth and justice to prevail with full confidence in the one true God who can do all things!