Dorothy Sayers presented an
effectual essay at Oxford in 1947 entitled, “The Lost
Tools of Learning”. This essay, along with a number of texts
upholding similar ideals, has inspired numerous classical schools across the
globe. By teaching to each child’s natural bent and pattern of learning
development (grammar, logic, and rhetoric phases), learning is optimized.
Classical education prioritizes broad, integrated, useful learning over highly
specialized learning which is isolated into distinct subjects. The goal is to
teach students how to think for themselves as opposed to merely teaching
them what to think for a test. Classical education strives to
inspire a life-long love of learning with tools to help students continuously
grow in both knowledge and wisdom. The Christian classical model strives
to train the whole person (mind, body and spirit) while recognizing and
nurturing the unique gifts, talents, experiences, and passions given by God to
each child, so that students will be well equipped to fulfill God's individual
calling for each and every student for His glory.
Another text that has largely
influenced classical education and is often used as an evaluation tool for
teachers is The Seven Laws of Teaching by John Milton Gregory. To
illustrate how intertwined STEM methodologies are with classical education, I
have briefly summarized those seven laws of teaching and then described
ten of the most effective STEM instruction methods as they relate to Milton's
seven laws of teaching.
The Seven Laws of Teaching
- Knowledge:
Know thoroughly the lesson to be taught. Teach from a full mind and
clear understanding.
- Engagement:
Gain and keep the interest of the pupils. Refuse to teach without
attention.
- Clarity:
Use clear and vivid words understood by both the pupil and the teacher in
the same sense.
- Connections:
Begin with what is already known by the pupil and proceed to what is
unknown by single, easy, natural steps, letting the known explain the unknown.
- Discovery: Use
the pupil’s own mind, exciting his own self-activities. Keep his thoughts
as much ahead of your expression as possible, making him a discoverer of
truth.
- Reproducing:
Require the pupil to reproduce in thought the lesson he is learning,
thinking it out in its parts, proofs, connections, and applications till
he can express it in his own language.
- Review: Review,
review, review – reproducing correctly the old, deepening its expression
with new thought, deepening its impression with new thought, correcting
false ideas, and completing the true.
As a STEM professional (engineer,
project manager, analyst, process improvement consultant), STEM teacher, and
math teacher and tutor, I have seen firsthand how helpful STEM methodologies
are in providing a comprehensive and effective classical education for all
students. Some of the most effective STEM teaching methods I have used
have been described by Middleweb.com as 10 of the best STEM practices. I
have used that list merged with my personal classroom experiences within a
classical educational system to show how STEM fits the classical model and
helps teachers more effectively follow the seven laws of teaching.
The starting point for STEM instruction is to believe in your students.
This step is often missing in schools where teachers or administrations do not
adapt teaching methods to match the different learning styles of their students
or where assumptions about students are made or labels assigned
inappropriately. Confidence in one's own ability to learn is the
gateway to increased learning. Teachers must understand the power
they wield with their words and their actions to open or close that gate for many
years to come, perhaps even for a lifetime. STEM classrooms demand
caring, nurturing teachers who offer encouragement and legitimate, earned
praise. Confidence grows as students achieve, so teachers must provide a
flexible classroom that provides every student the opportunity to succeed where
they are instead of forcing each child to squeeze into the teacher's own
odd-shaped mold or narrow rubric, which may be contrary to the child's natural bent.
Flexible STEM teachers also offer challenging work to students who learn quickly
and easily become bored. Watered down curriculum with excessive review
and no opportunity to go beyond the limits of the text communicates to students
that the teacher does not believe they can handle challenging work or that they
do not care enough to take the effort to stretch them. Believing in your
students especially helps with engagement (Law #2).
Another fundamental STEM teaching method is to transfer control of the
learning process to the student so that students become self-sufficient
learners. Teachers trained in STEM methods do not spoon feed information
to students. Instead, they help students derive answers for themselves
using guided inquiry and self-directed lab activities to lead students to make
their own discoveries. Reference "10 Ways to Encourage Students to Take Responsibility
for their Own Learning" for more ideas. This STEM step is
a direct response to the law of self-discovery (Law #5).
STEM programs make fostering curiosity a priority in the
classroom. Before presenting new information, teachers ask open-ended
questions or present a real world problem for class discussion. In a STEM
class, the teacher will present a demonstration or lead the students through an
experiment first before spitting out new facts and concepts to draw students in
and get them asking their own questions out of genuine interest and curiosity.
This strategy has been very effective in keeping all students engaged
(Law #2), even those students who struggle to stay focused, both during and
after my classes. Many of my students come to class each week with stories of different
experiments they have performed at home or with interesting facts from books
they have sought out and read pertaining to the subject matter purely out of their
own curiosity. When students are bursting to share related information
they have learned or new discoveries they have made since our last class, then
I am encouraged and motivated by that evidence of curious, active,
stimulated minds.
Another STEM best practice that has
had a huge impact in my class has been providing hands-on, experiential
learning. Kinesthetic learners are not the only students who need
interactive learning. All students are better able to remember concepts
when they interact with them in a multi-sensory way. Hands-on
manipulation and experimentation builds critical thinking skills for cross
functional applications while keeping students engaged and motivated (Law #2). Hands-on experience also provides students with the ability to transfer book knowledge into useful applications which is so vital to becoming college and career ready. Since students know to expect hands-on activities in every class, they
consistently come to class excited and eager to learn.
The list of STEM best practices also includes collaboration among students,
usually through team exercises or interactive class discussions. When
facilitated in an orderly manner, collaboration fosters clarity (Law #3) while
helping students make more mental connections for more efficient knowledge
building (Law #4). Learning to become a team player will not only help
students succeed in school and in their careers, but it will also give them
greater joy and success in personal life and ministry. As students experience
the synergy that flows out of group collaboration, they value each other more
highly and are more inclined to build up one another.
STEM methodology insists that teachers provide opportunities to take risks
and to accept failure, for failure is a critical step in the learning
process. The greatest contributors to society throughout world
history have made big mistakes, but the rich lessons gained through those
mistakes led to greater discoveries and contributions. Students need
practice making mistakes without reproof to build courage and confidence.
Occasionally, experiments I have planned for my classes and practiced at home have
not worked as expected during the class time. Seeing their teacher's
project fail gave the students more freedom to take risks themselves.
Those failures were not wasted, however, because then the students were
tasked with helping me figure out what went wrong which built trouble shooting
and problem solving skills. This risk/failure teaching tool addresses the laws of engagement
(#2), connections (#4), and self-discovery (#5).
The next few STEM best practices
support the laws of knowledge (#1), engagement (#2) and clarity (#3). MiddleWeb advises STEM teachers as follows: "Be
an inspiring leader and role model for students. Be positive and
enthusiastic about what students are learning and how they are learning it. Be
passionate in your teaching and your love of your subject area."
Those directives are a paraphrase of classical education ideals. Teachers
will not be passionate about a subject they do not understand really
well. Knowledgeable teachers (Law #1) are inspiring teachers.
Another imperative of effective STEM
teachers is to be flexible and know how to quickly redirect lesson plans
when class discussions take a different though productive turn according to the developing thoughts of
the students. The teacher must know the subject well enough to following
the change in direction and pull the conversation back when appropriate without being too
dependent upon a scripted lesson plan. (Law #1).
STEM methodology also insists that teachers
never stop learning. Teachers must constantly seek out ways to
communicate more effectively (Law #3) and gain more knowledge of their
subjects. (Law #1). STEM teachers learn in community, working with
colleagues to build knowledge together (Laws #1 and #4).
While the laws of reproducing and
reviewing may not be as obvious in this summary of 10 best STEM practices,
those laws are a natural result of a classroom following the STEM format. Every
class I teach begins with a comprehensive review session, but I do not ask
students to recite vocabulary definitions word-for-word as I gave them,for repeating my words verbatim does not indicate comprehension. I also avoid asking each question the same way. Students have to reproduce the
information for me in their own words or show me through demonstration. Review
continues as students are asked to apply the new concepts to other real world
applications. Even though I teach elective classes without testing or
grading requirements, students can reproduce advanced concepts for me
without losing memory because they have interacted with the topics in so many
different meaningful ways and have associated the concepts with everyday life. The
structure of an integrated STEM class allows new concepts to build upon previous
concepts, so each new topic is an expansion or an application of previous
material. For example, when we introduced the concepts of buoyancy and
ballasts to maintain a boat's stability in the water, the students then asked
if airplanes use ballasts to remain stable in the air. When we study air
pressure, flight, and aerodynamics in future classes, they will review again
the concepts taught within the context of oceanography and then build upon them
within a different context. The processing skills introduced in the first
few weeks of class are practiced in every other class to follow as the students
build their processing capabilities.
Part 1 of this series defines STEM and provides a
brief history and summary of the goals and philosophies driving STEM programs.
Part 2 compares STEM to classical education. The last installment shows how STEM methodologies can also supplement and enrich an education founded upon a Biblical worldview.